Why Have A Tolling Agreement

Why Have A Tolling Agreement

If you are about to take legal action, or if you think you are being sued, you should consider proposing a toll agreement. Part of the printing when filing a complaint is certain that they will file before the applicable statute of limitations. A toll agreement is a written agreement signed by both parties for a possible appeal that suspends the statute of limitations for an agreed period. In exchange for the plaintiff delaying the filing of an appeal until the expiry of the toll agreement, the defendant agrees to waive the right to use that time to calculate the expiry period of the claim. With the statute of limitations suspended, the parties may have the necessary time to negotiate and resolve the dispute. If the parties agree on a toll agreement, the scope of the agreement is governed by the main provisions of the agreement, including the types of claims you could file against the co-accused. In product liability cases, you may be entitled to a contribution against co-defendants to ensure that your client does not pay more than his or her share of proportionate liability, which is assessed in joint and several liability jurisdictions. You may also have a tacit claim against a manufacturer if you are a downstream distributor or seller, or you are entitled to contractual compensation if your client has a defence and compensation contract. There may also be warranty requests. Clear language will avoid disputes over the scope of the agreement. See z.B., Camico`s courage.

In the. Co. v. Citizens Bank, 474 F.3d 989 (7th Cir. 2007). Even with respect to the additional bargaining space that provides for a toll agreement, the applicant can pursue a dispute if the hearing fails. In this case, the defendant can benefit from the procedure by being better informed of the applicant`s claims. Conversely, the applicant can benefit by inserting provisions into the toll agreement that may compel a defendant to submit documents that are otherwise available to the applicant only at the stage of proceeding. Although toll agreements are useful instruments, they have potential drawbacks.

First, check if the court has introduced a timetable with a deadline for counter-claims and potential conflict with your toll agreement. If your client is entitled to contractual or tacit compensation and the co-accused has not agreed to compensate your client, your client may seek clarification on the issue of pre-trial compensation. Approval of a toll agreement may also be more commercial than procedural. If, in the past, the parties have maintained a mutually beneficial business relationship and hope to do so in the future, while maintaining their legal rights, a toll agreement can achieve this. As this is a private agreement between the parties – unless the agreement is ambiguous – a court will not look beyond the document of the agreement to determine what claims the parties intended to keep. A broad language of the toll agreement could retain independent or unknown claims. Too narrow a language can limit the remedies available for litigation.